A Woman's Prerogative
Overview of Part III - The Essence of Environmental Control
READ ACTUAL EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK, PART III BELOW
PART III OF A WOMAN'S PREROGATIVE ADDRESSES
CONTROL OF ONES ENVIRONMENT. HOW TO CONTROL ONES
CHILDREN, RELATIVES, EMPLOYERS AND OTHER ENTITIES
RELATIVE TO THEIR ENVIRONMENT.

PART III WILL INSTRUCT YOU IN THE MANNER YOU SHOULD
IMPLEMENT TO EFFECTIVELY CONTROL STEP-CHILDREN,
STEP FATHERS, AND THE OTHER PROBLEMS WHICH EVOLVE
FROM RELATIONSHIPS JOINED FROM PARENTS WHO ARE
NOT BASIC MATERNAL OR PATERNAL TO THE CHILD.

PART III ALSO ADDRESSES THE PROBLEMS BORN FROM
PRESSURES FROM RELATIVES, FRIENDS, AND ASSOCIATES.

LEARN FROM THIS SECTION WHY WOMEN ARE SMARTER
THAN MEN AND INFINITELY POSITIONED FOR CONTROL
BECAUSE ENVIRONMENT IS "HER" GREATEST FORUM AND
SHE EXCELS WITHIN THIS SPECTRUM.
From the position of the Essence of Environmental Control, the female spouse is definitely the most
difficult to control. This fact is substantiated simply because “environment” is her element. She thrives in
the environmental element because her very nature is designed for coping and dealing with family,
friends, and associates. Historically, the female excels in the field of environment.
Men and women are not equal. The erroneous belief shared by many respecting equality between the
sexes is a fallacy of perception disproved by the facts. Many believe a woman’s ability to bear a child,
although making her different, only represents a physical difference and the male still retains the mental
edge regarding equality. The fact is; since women do have this capability and humans are animals
requiring maintenance after birth for a prolonged period; the woman is equipped to facilitate this
upbringing. This empowers her with much more than a physical ability to bear a child, but demonstrates
that she must innately have a greater emotional, mental, and calculating ability than her male counterpart.

A woman is therefore a true paradox. On the one hand, when she truly loves, she is the most subservient
animal on earth. There is nothing she will not do for the benefit of her lover or to give him pleasure. On
the other hand, when she does not love, her capacity for assumption of the various roles makes her
infinitely dangerous. These two traits are somehow meshed with her natural compassion for others she
perceives as less fortunate than herself. It is without question this compassion is derived from her
natural maternal instincts. This demonstrates yet another facet of the many mental and unseen traits
conjunctive with her ability to give birth.

When a woman does not love, her power lies in her ability to assimilate different characteristics to a
believable degree and without foundation of meaning. This assimilation is solely to advance her purpose
or reach her goal. These attributes are evidenced by the fact that she possesses that which man innately
(or has been taught by environment), desires.A woman not only has the ability to separate the reality from
the fantasy but to assume the fantasy and make it seem real.  In total, from the view of everything other
than the physical strength and prowess, woman is superior to man.

When one is confronted by a superior force or being, control does not lie in confrontation. Control lies in
compromise and the Trojan horse concept. Man, unfortunately, is not taught to deceive; therefore he is ill
equipped to deal with a woman on her terms.  One must understand that women are masters of deceit.
They are taught from a very young age that deception is just one of her many weapons available in the
war of the sexes. They are taught to deceive with respect to makeup, their bodies, and many other things
requisite to her ability to present a picture of delight, sexuality, and beauty to the male. The disturbing
thing about this deception is they are also taught that it’s ok to utilize these weapons.

In essence, women are smarter, have greater emotional control, and most important – possess the ability
to separate their emotions. To control them one must establish a reason for her to make an emotional
commitment. This is accomplished by creating a sense of purpose within her that she accepts as valid.  
Once this is accomplished, one must convert this sense of purpose into a commitment strong enough for
her to do the things desired by the male spouse. For example, I have seldom heard of a man winning an
argument with his spouse. He may certainly have a valid position and argument, but in the final analysis,
he will lose. Men win arguments when they do not argue but acquiesce to the spouse’s position. Creating
a sense of overconfidence is the key to any type of successful control of a female spouse.
Overconfidence is not created with friction but with care; a removal of one’s ego, and a verbal
heightening of her ability. Remember, we are not talking about a situation where either party loves the
other. If this were true in either case; e.g. if either party loved the other one, this portion of the discipline
would be moot.

Outside of love, a man does not possess the power to sexually control a woman. He may take her to
sexual heights never before experienced by her, but unless she loves him, his lovemaking will be sought
after by her but not used as a basis for her actions or a foundation for control. The woman’s view is: “It
may be good, but not that good.”  Meaning – it’s not good enough for her to relinquish control. Any man,
who believes he can sexually control a woman with his penis, is almost certainly being controlled by the
woman’s brain.