A Woman's Prerogative
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| Overview of Part II - The Essence of Sexual Control |
| Part II of A Woman's Prerogative addresses sexual control. Anyone who does not believe we live in a sexual society obviously either lives on Mars, or is not being realistic. Our society is rife with sexual innuendo and an overt sexual emphasis that penetrates into EVERY FACET of our daily lives. In this section you will learn the five basic sexual motivations possessed by men which exemplifies their type, how to recognize these motivations as well as how to control them. You will also learn there are nine different types of women from a motivational view. You will learn how to recognize them as well, and perhaps see yourself explained in detail. Part II explains the importance of sexual control, demonstrates its origin, its philosophical basis, and explains in detail what you should do to enhance the offering. It explains the different misconceptions many, many women have about men and how to correct them. |
| It explains how to create, modify and understand motivations as well as how important motivations are to the subject. You will learn the difference between sensuality, femininity, and class. How to understand love as well as how to define it with someone you are in a relationship with. How to set perimeters, establish conditions, and most important, - enhance what you have rather than try to change it into something you do not possess. |
| READ ACTUAL EXCERPTS FROM PART II OF THE BOOK BELOW |
| Page 72 Prior to moving to the next level of instruction, a complete and through understanding of motivation is required by the reader. I cannot stress too stringently, or state too strongly the necessity of learning all facets of motivation. Motivation is the absolute foundation of the Essence of Sexual Control. The basic element of control regardless of the discipline … is vested in motivation. For example, we know hunger is an innate motivation. We are born with the motivation for food. This motivation remains in a potential state as long as we are being fed regularly. Hunger only moves into a kinetic state when we are not fed. Once it moves into a kinetic state, hunger is immediately established as a priority. Everyday that we continue without food, the priority becomes greater and our food choices become less stringent and significant. At this juncture we will eat items we normally would refuse because the hunger motivation has begun to override our conscious dislikes for certain foods. It is vital we understand that equal with our desire to eat comes a lessening of our inhibitions or what we would do to obtain food. Before our motivation went into the kinetic stage we may have refused to walk a block to get something to eat. Haven’t you ever heard someone say “Oh, I’m hungry, but not ‘that’ hungry if I must walk a block to eat”! Or … I am hungry but liver is disgusting and there’s no way I will ever eat it. We soon reach a point where we will do “anything” to eat “something”. Even if this means doing things we swore we would never do, or breaking laws either moral, societal, or otherwise we swore to uphold. The bottom line is; the desire to eat advanced |
Page 73 by our hunger removes not only our food choices, but the restrictions we placed on how and under what conditions we would obtain food. Food now becomes a basic essential and primary motivation and nothing else is important. Certainly the argument can be made that one cannot compare sexual desire or motivation with hunger or the motivation to eat. It would be stated that while hunger is necessary to sustaining life; sex or the motivation for sex, is not. Anyone who does not believe that the desire to have sex can be as strong as the desire to eat certainly is not being realistic or is immune to historical fact. Moreover, since we have established that value is a relative abstract; if one could place the sexual motivation on the same plane or level as that of hunger, then the responses (when the stimuli is denied), would mirror one another. In the subject’s mind, the need for sexual satisfaction would be just as primary as the need for food. Therefore one would be able to successfully predict the actions of the subject based upon the same stimuli-response conditioning used to train other animals. This is accomplished by withholding food to create and magnify the motivation, then requiring certain actions to be done (based upon certain stimuli), in order to receive the food. Women have been practicing this philosophy (in different forms), for centuries. This discipline teaches the philosophy, structure, process, and business aspect of the sexual power possessed by women. It is no great feat for a woman to sexually “turn on” a man. This power is innate; also it is no great feat for a woman to present “conditions” to the man to receive her sexual favors. Contrary to popular opinion, most women |
| Page 74 engage in this activity either consistently or at the very least – at some time in her life. Seldom do women grant sexual favors without conditions of some sort. It is a given some women will vigorously state they do not adhere to this practice, but even requesting the lights to be off, or a condom worn, or how she is touched are all conditions, notwithstanding the many others either consciously or subconsciously imposed by the woman prior to granting sexual favors. In the final analysis, women possess that which man desires. Therefore she is possessed of the power to state conditions for man to receive it. |